but for now doesn't seem like a huge upgrade over 2020. I may change my mind after I kick the tires more. However, be careful as you can overdoo effects like over contrast/sharpen and end up with unnatural looks. so almost like a photoshop light in some ways. most are fluff to play with but some really powerful capabilities due to how each effect can be applied selectively via masks and use different blending modes. The interesting/good things about ON1 are the effects tabs. Wish they'd focus on better noise reduction for when I'm pushing things. many of the new things are irrelevant to me so far. I've only had about 15 mins on the new version so can't really comment if it's better than the previous. However learned about and started using the camera linear RAW profile and had much better success at creating my own default presets. Theres no need to import your photos just direct Photo RAW to where they are on your drive and theyll just appear. Can't tell you how many hours I spent pulling my hair out trying to figure that out. ON1 Photo RAW uses a browser-based system. There are a lot of good things about ON1 but shortcomings on some areas, esp around noise reduction and honestly the camera profiles are way off for the canon stuff. I still haven't tried capture one due to the costs. its bit of a strong sales tactic, but seems to be common among the lightroom alternatives. (PART 1) Which Is Best Lightroom vs Capture One vs Luminar vs On1 Photo RAW vs Aurora HDRDISCOUNT CODESGet 10 OFF of Luminar and/or Aurora HD. While technically perpetual license etc, they only put out updates 2-3 times in a year before you need to buy the next version for upgrades. did the latest DXO trial and found the UI clunky and slow, but that may have been me not being familiar on how to tweak it. *sigh* took plunge and bought as I've taken the time to learn it and it will support the R5 RAWs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |